Why did Peter P make an issue that PB’s bankruptcy attorney was a relative, therefore PB didn’t have representation? There’s no law or legal ethics rules that a lawyer who is also a relative cannot represent you. I think Peter threw that out there to confuse the jury that PB was being untruthful
When the person is telling the truth their story never changes. Peter actually proved that PB was telling the truth.
Why did Peter P make an issue that PB’s bankruptcy attorney was a relative, therefore PB didn’t have representation? There’s no law or legal ethics rules that a lawyer who is also a relative cannot represent you. I think Peter threw that out there to confuse the jury that PB was being untruthful
Will there be another court date for sentencing, if found guilty??
Hi Matt, what do you think the verdict will be?
I think she's guilty on all 12, based on the case prosecutors presented.
Absolutely. Thank you for your excellent coverage.